FWIW, I, personally, very much appreciate efforts like these with a dedicated focus on the clarity of communication and quality of the final presentation.
Love the contribution @andrei_bulzan ! Thanks!
Also, a shoutout to @bgrubbs1984 's suggestion here, where he wanted to make visuals to:
explain complex problems in a simple (and entertaining) way that even a child can understand it
We need to celebrate more Mathematicians as Poets 
–
While we are in the process of reviewing all the write-ups we received for Phase 1, it’s clear many of them are principally LLM-written (which is fine, especially with a clear disclaimer), but I feel a vast majority of them would have benefited from just a few more conscious hours of genuine human touch: to tighten the narrative, improve clarity of communication, and really polish the final presentation. It would make the write-ups a lot easier to review for the reviewers, a lot more digestible for the community in general, and a delight to read for any reader.
I wonder if some individuals, who naturally enjoy that process, might want to collaborate more closely with others already writing the technical write-ups, to help improve them.
For the Phase 2 write-ups, we will try to do a better job of publicly sharing guidelines for the write-ups, but would also love to hear suggestions that the community has on what such guidelines should look like. (Very open to hearing from everyone, either privately over email at: arc-whestbench@aicrowd.com, or also publicly here on the forums.)
Disclaimer: I will personally not be involved in the review of the technical write-ups in consideration for the prizes. So opinions here my own. 
PS: For people interested in the topic, and unrelated to Whestbench, but this might be interesting: